Square Gold vs Hexagonal Gold: The Oxidation That Was Not

Published on May 25, 2026 | Translated from Spanish

A quantum mechanics study reveals that the atomic arrangement of gold determines its oxidation rate. The square structure easily splits oxygen molecules from the air, initiating the process. In contrast, the hexagonal structure is much less efficient and must distort back to a square shape, an obstacle that delays the reaction.

gold atomic lattice structures comparison, square lattice arrangement actively splitting oxygen molecules from air, glowing oxygen atoms being pulled apart at the lattice edge, hexagonal lattice nearby remaining inert with oxygen molecules bouncing off, lattice distortion lines showing hexagonal trying to revert to square shape, quantum mechanics simulation interface in background, molecular model visualization with metallic gold spheres and red oxygen atoms, cinematic engineering illustration, dramatic side lighting on crystalline surfaces, subtle particle trails indicating reaction paths, photorealistic technical render

More precise catalysts thanks to atomic structure ๐Ÿงช

Chemical engineer Matthew Montemore, co-author of the study, points out that the oxidation rate in reconstructed gold is between one billion and one trillion times slower. Furthermore, gold oxide is unstable: even maintaining the square structure, it only forms a thin layer. These findings would allow designing catalysts with greater control over chemical reactions, optimizing industrial processes.

Lazy gold: prefers not to oxidize ๐Ÿ˜ด

It seems that gold, besides being expensive, is lazy. If it is already difficult for it to oxidize under normal conditions, when reconstructed into a hexagonal structure, it directly takes a billion-year break. And if it happens to oxidize, the oxide is so unstable that it disappears almost instantly. A metal that refuses to work: the perfect employee for doing nothing.