Prosecutors Office Admits Secret Meetings with Those Under Investigation in Twenty Twenty-Five

The Prosecutor's Office has acknowledged before the judge that a former official held two meetings with former activist Leire Díez and Santos Cerdán's lawyer during 2025. The Attorney General was informed after the fact, and there are no records of official visits. For the public, this reveals possible contacts between the agency and individuals involved in a scheme to obstruct judicial proceedings, raising doubts about its independence.

semi-transparent door of a government building showing two silhouettes entering without registration, a security guard looking away while a hidden camera records the scene, a desk with a visitor logbook left open but empty, dramatic shadows from overhead fluorescent lights, cinematic photorealistic style, dark grey marble walls, reflections on polished floor, tension in body language, ultra-detailed textures of leather briefcase and suit fabric, surveillance camera lens glare, moody institutional lighting

Opaque transparency: when the visitor system fails at headquarters 🕵️

The absence of access records contrasts with the usual security protocols in institutional headquarters. In any public agency, visits are documented through time control systems or digital logs. The lack of this data suggests that the meetings may have been held outside official channels, avoiding an administrative trail. This practice, if confirmed, violates the traceability principles required of the Prosecutor's Office in a rule of law.

Discreet meetings: the art of leaving no trace at reception 🚪

If you want to meet without leaving a trace, the best thing is not to go through the main door. Those involved seem to have mastered the art of stealthy entry, like bureaucratic ninjas. Too bad that, in the end, the paper trail of visitor logs is harder to dodge than an oral trial. Next time, maybe they'll use a secret code or a Wi-Fi password to get in.