United States Views Leading in AI as Key to Global Dominance

Published on January 16, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Conceptual map illustrating the technological rivalry between the United States and China in the field of artificial intelligence, with icons of chips, digital brains, and flags of both countries connected by data lines in a symbolic race.

United States Views Leading in AI as Key to Global Dominance

For the strategic establishment of the United States, securing primacy in artificial intelligence has become a non-negotiable component of its global influence. This stance motivates a series of actions designed to curb China's progress in this crucial technological domain. However, the perception of the gap separating the two powers is not uniform and generates intense debate 🤔.

A Gap That Some in the Industry Measure in Months, Not Years

Contrasting with the political discourse that often paints an overwhelming advantage, prominent figures in the sector offer a more nuanced analysis. Demis Hassabis, CEO of DeepMind (owned by Google), has stated that AI models developed in China are only delayed compared to American ones by a margin of a few months. This technical perspective suggests that the Chinese ecosystem possesses remarkable agility to close gaps, thus questioning the idea of permanent and uncontestable American supremacy.

Implications of a Narrow Technological Gap:
  • Strategies to contain technological advancement could quickly become obsolete and require constant revisions.
  • The AI race transforms into an exercise of adaptation and iteration speed, rather than possessing an initial overwhelming advantage.
  • The competition focuses on the ability to implement and refine technologies at an accelerated pace, an area where China has demonstrated strength.
"Sometimes, the race is not about who has the most powerful engine, but who can adjust the engine the fastest on the straightaway."

AI as the Battlefield of Geopolitical Rivalry

The current scenario consolidates artificial intelligence development as a central axis in the struggle between Washington and Beijing. Measures such as restricting access to advanced processing chips or attracting and retaining specialized talent are tactical maneuvers within this broader contest. Hassabis's observation, although arising from a technical angle, carries significant geopolitical weight: if the advantage is measured in months, the window of opportunity for any containment strategy is notably reduced.

Key Actions in the Technological Competition:
  • Imposition of controls on

Related Links