The Prosecutor's Office has blocked the request from the families of the ten victims of the 2024 Campanar fire to reopen the investigation. A new expert report questions the official document on the facade cladding, identified as a key factor in the fire's spread. However, the public prosecutor maintains that the report does not provide new evidence, but rather reinterprets already known material, closing the door to further judicial inquiries.
Technical cladding under scrutiny: the debate on fire-resistant materials 🔥
The new expert report focuses on analyzing the facade's thermal insulation, a sprayed polyurethane system without fire barriers. Experts point out that the original certificate omitted key fire reaction tests under real ventilation conditions. Current regulations require testing for behavior in external fire scenarios, but the questioned document applied static laboratory parameters. This technical discrepancy is the core of the conflict between the parties.
The magical report the Prosecutor's Office sees but refuses to touch 🧐
The families have submitted an expert report that, according to the Prosecutor's Office, is nothing more than an old acquaintance in new clothes. It's like taking a plumber's invoice to court and being told they already knew the faucet was leaking. The document questions the cladding, but for the public prosecutor, it's like reading a book twice: the story doesn't change, even if you underline the pages with a highlighter.