A woman who won two civil lawsuits against Donald Trump now faces a perjury investigation. The judicial system, instead of focusing on the repeat offender, pursues the one who dared to speak out. This hypocrisy sends a clear message: testifying against the powerful has consequences, while they speak without filter.
The judicial algorithm that fails with the powerful ⚖️
Procedural logic resembles a poorly calibrated system: prosecutors dedicate resources to verifying every word of a victim, while statements from powerful figures go without forensic review. The technical solution involves implementing equitable investigation protocols, where perjury is pursued with the same intensity regardless of who commits it. Without double standards, the system would regain credibility.
The reward for speaking out: a trial for telling the truth 🎭
It seems the new judicial slogan is: if you dare to point out a powerful person, get ready to have your sworn statement scrutinized under a magnifying glass. Meanwhile, the harasser can keep declaring that the sun rises at night without anyone batting an eye. A system so absurd it almost seems like a joke, if it weren't for the fact that the victims aren't laughing.