Justice Investigates Carroll for Perjury in Trials Against Trump

Published on May 29, 2026 | Translated from Spanish

The U.S. Department of Justice has opened a criminal investigation into writer E. Jean Carroll, who sued Donald Trump for defamation and sexual assault. According to reports on Wednesday, the probe focuses on possible false statements under oath during the civil proceedings, which could lead to formal charges.

Federal courtroom interior, Department of Justice seal on wall, E. Jean Carroll raising her right hand while swearing on a Bible, judge's gavel mid-strike on wooden block, legal documents marked perjury investigation scattered on desk, FBI agent holding a magnifying glass over a deposition transcript, glowing red false statement indicators on paper, cinematic photorealistic style, dramatic chiaroscuro lighting from venetian blinds, tense courtroom atmosphere, shallow depth of field focusing on the oath-taking hand, ultra-detailed wood grain and fabric textures, forensic evidence markers on desk, motion blur on gavel swing, technical legal visualization

Perjury as a failure in the judicial verification system ⚖️

In the legal field, perjury constitutes a serious breach of testimonial credibility. Prosecutors analyze recordings, documents, and transcripts to detect contradictions in Carroll's statements. This process is reminiscent of data verification systems, where consistency between versions is key. If inconsistencies are confirmed, the case could reopen debates about the reliability of witnesses in high-profile litigation.

The irony that a lawsuit over lies now investigates lies 🤡

And while Trump celebrated every tweet as an absolute truth, now it turns out that the accuser might have issues with the truth under oath. It's like in a bar fight where both sides end up on the floor. If Carroll lied, we'll have to ask whether the judicial system is a ring where only the one with the better lawyer wins, or the one who remembers their script best.