Trump sanctions against the ICC: judicial racism and sexism

Published on June 27, 2026 | Translated from Spanish

Ugandan judge Solomy Balungi denounced that the sanctions imposed by Donald Trump against her and a Peruvian colleague from the International Criminal Court are racist and sexist. They are the only two sanctioned out of a group of five judges who made a unanimous decision. The measures prevent her from working and affect her mental and family health, revealing a pattern of discrimination based on origin and gender.

photorealistic technical illustration of a courtroom scene, five judges seated at a bench in identical black robes, a glowing gavel mid-strike, two female judges of African and Latin American descent isolated by a harsh red spotlight while the other three remain in shadow, a male figure resembling Trump placing heavy stone blocks labeled sanctions on their desks, their hands trembling as they reach for legal documents, a cracked digital tablet displaying a frozen work interface, courtroom seal blurred in background, dramatic chiaroscuro lighting, cinematic judicial composition, subtle mechanical gears visible in the bench structure symbolizing broken justice machinery

Legal technology: how political power blocks global justice ⚖️

Washington's sanctions activate financial and migratory mechanisms that paralyze ICC judges. Surveillance systems and international banking prevent magistrates from accessing funds or traveling. In this case, the technical selectivity is evident: only two jurists from the Global South were blocked, while their male colleagues from central countries continue operating without restrictions. Technology here is not neutral, but a weapon of political control.

The club of five: only they pay the price 😅

It looks like a judicial reality show: five judges sign the same thing, but only two women from Africa and South America receive the punishment. Perhaps Trump thought sanctions were like a supermarket discount: they apply only to imported products. The funny thing is that no one explained to the other three judges how to avoid the veto. Maybe they should change their gender or country of origin to save their career.