Meta versus NSO: ad blocking and order with no real effect

Published on June 09, 2026 | Translated from Spanish

Meta announced that it blocked an identity theft attack by NSO Group on WhatsApp and filed a contempt order. The announcement sounds like a victory, but history shows that NSO continues to create exploits that WhatsApp only detects after journalists and activists have already been spied on. The legal order is more of a gesture than a real solution.

cinematic photorealistic scene of a cracked smartphone screen displaying a ghostly WhatsApp logo, a shadowy figure with a hacker hoodie typing on a laptop connected to the phone via a USB cable, glowing red code lines streaming from the laptop to the phone while a broken gavel and a torn legal document lie discarded on the table beside them, the smartphone screen flickering with a fake verification prompt, metallic server racks in the background, dark blue and red lighting, high contrast shadows, ultra-detailed hardware components, technical illustration style

NSO Exploits: Meta's Protocol Remains the Achilles' Heel 🛡️

NSO Group's exploits take advantage of vulnerabilities in WhatsApp's encryption protocol, often through missed calls or malicious files. Meta claims to close the gaps after each attack, but it cannot or will not proactively audit its own code. Meanwhile, NSO sells its tools to governments that demand technical silence, leaving users exposed to malware that mutates faster than patches.

Meta Calls for Regulation: The Lobbyist Disguised as a Savior 🎭

Meta presents the contempt order as if it were a citizen's shield, but it seems more like a self-promotional announcement. The company calls for stricter regulations that, curiously, only the giants can comply with. Meanwhile, NSO continues selling its toys to governments, and the average user believes their WhatsApp is safe because they read a nice headline. In the end, the only winner is Meta, which turns a security problem into marketing material.