The Supreme Court has sentenced Víctor de Aldama to four and a half years for the masks case, but the sentence has been suspended. In exchange, he must behave well, submit semi-annual reports, and perform community service for one year. For the average citizen, this sounds like collaborating with justice is a free pass to avoid prison, raising doubts about the real severity of sentences in corruption cases.
Compliance algorithms and the dilemma of procedural collaboration 🤖
The judicial system prioritizes cooperation over direct punishment, a model reminiscent of corporate compliance protocols where an error is mitigated with follow-up reports. In the field of software development, this approach translates into semi-annual monitoring systems: the convicted person becomes a node in a control network. Technology could automate these reports, but the question remains: to what extent can an algorithm measure real reintegration or merely bureaucratic compliance with deadlines.
The reintegration plan: from the suite to park cleaning 🧹
Aldama avoids prison in exchange for a year of community service. We imagine the former commissioner sweeping squares in a reflective vest while some councilor reminds him not to forget the reports. Justice has decided it is better to keep him busy and monitored than inside a cell. At least, if he misbehaves, the next semi-annual report will be a much more serious incident report. Of course, let's hope he doesn't have to clean the streets where he distributed the masks.