MEI Increases Its Social Security Contribution

Published on January 05, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Chart showing the impact of the MEI increase on a payroll, comparing gross salary, deductions, and net before and after the change.

The MEI Increases Its Social Security Contribution

The Intergenerational Equity Mechanism (MEI) has modified its tax rate, a decision that is already in effect. This change directly impacts the economy of employees and the expense structure of companies. Both parties must now pay a larger amount to Social Security, which redefines immediate financial calculations. 🧾

Direct Consequences on Payrolls and Budgets

The MEI contribution percentage has been raised from 0.7% to 0.8%, applied to each worker's regulatory base. In practice, companies withhold a larger portion of the gross salary to transfer it. This means the employee receives less money in their bank account. Simultaneously, the organization must pay its increased share, which raises the total cost of each employment contract.

Immediate effects of the increase:
  • The worker's net salary decreases, reducing their purchasing power.
  • Companies assume an extra expense for each person they hire or keep on staff.
  • A tangible impact is generated on household economies and business financial planning.
For the worker, it's as if a part of the next salary increase already had a fixed destination before reaching their pocket.

The Purpose Behind the Tax Adjustment

The main objective of this move is to finance the public pension system. The authorities seek to ensure that funds are sufficient to cover obligations to future generations. This mechanism acts as a complement to other welfare state reforms, argued as a necessary step to maintain the sustainability of the model in the long term.

Key points of the strategy:
  • Balance the pension system's accounts in the long term.
  • Ensure the availability of resources for future pensioners.
  • Complement other social welfare reform measures.

Reflection on the Cost Distribution

This increase has reignited the debate on the distribution of the financial burden. While the impact on purchasing power and operating costs is immediate, the discussion centers on who should bear the greater weight of these adjustments. Companies integrate this new fixed cost into their budgets, and workers see a portion of their remuneration directly allocated to sustaining the system. The balance between future sustainability and present effort continues to be the core of the issue. ⚖️