The Legal Battle Against Planned Obsolescence in Printers
Planned obsolescence in the printer sector has become a legal battleground where consumer associations are facing off against tech giants. 🖨️⚖️
Complaints Against Major Manufacturers
The organization HOP has filed multiple legal complaints against companies like Epson, HP, Canon, and Brother for implementing systems that artificially reduce the lifespan of consumables. A preliminary investigation began in France against Epson in 2017, while in 2024, accusations against HP were renewed for limiting functionalities with refurbished cartridges.
Identified Planned Obsolescence Techniques:- Electronic chips that estimate ink levels without real mechanical measurement
- Internal usage counters that block devices if not reset
- Firmware updates designed to prevent the use of compatible cartridges
Legal proceedings are advancing with extreme slowness, reflecting the complexity of proving planned obsolescence practices in the technological sphere.
Responses and Market Evolution
Some manufacturers have developed technological alternatives like Epson's EcoTank systems, which use refillable tanks avoiding traditional cartridges. However, these solutions do not represent a widespread change in the industry.
Current Situation by Manufacturer:- HP: Continues to receive reports of cartridge blocking after updates
- Epson: Maintains dual systems with both more sustainable and traditional options
- Canon and Brother: Continue to use restrictive chips in their consumables
Impact on Consumers and Legal Landscape
End users remain in a state of uncertainty where they must face high costs for original consumables or risk having their devices blocked. The lack of forceful judicial resolutions after years of proceedings demonstrates the regulatory difficulties in this sector, creating a legal limbo that primarily benefits manufacturers. 💸⚖️