The Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office requests documentation from the Court of Auditors on Montoro's law firm
The Public Prosecutor's Office has taken a key step in its investigation, formally requesting the supervisory body to deliver all the papers it holds regarding the professional office operated by former minister Cristóbal Montoro during his tenure at the helm of the Treasury. This move seeks to determine whether any conflict of interest or irregular action occurred. 🕵️♂️
The core of the investigation: an active office
The inquiry aims to clarify what tasks were carried out and who the clients were of this law firm, which Montoro did not close when he assumed the ministerial position in 2011. The incompatibilities law for high-ranking officials requires suspending any private work that may hinder their public duties. Prosecutors will examine whether maintaining this structure could have created situations where the private benefits of the firm collided with ministerial obligations.
Key points analyzed by the Prosecutor's Office:- The specific activity and client portfolio of the firm during the term.
- Possible breach of incompatibilities regulations for high-ranking officials.
- Existence of contracts or economic relationships indicating a conflict.
Managing a country's accounts is a monumental task, but balancing those of a private firm during that period can raise even more complex questions.
Institutional collaboration to gather evidence
The Court of Auditors' response to the prosecutorial request constitutes another procedural step in the case. This body, which oversees the economic management of the public sector, may hold significant data on agreements or financial links useful for clarifying the facts. Cooperation between both entities is common in these processes to gather all relevant information.
Role of the Court of Auditors:- Acts as custodian of relevant documentation on public economic management.
- Its collaboration is essential to advance the prosecutorial investigation.
- Provides a framework of external control that can contribute key evidence.
A thorough examination of the accounting
The Prosecutor's Office shows a firm determination to scrutinize the activity of that period under a microscope. The ultimate goal is not only to assess a possible infraction but to ensure that the exercise of such a relevant public office is carried out with absolute transparency and far from any shadow of private interest. The case underscores the importance of control mechanisms to preserve the integrity of institutions. ⚖️