Surprise inspection of Arm in Korea over anticompetitive practices in technology licensing

Published on January 07, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Modern corporate building with Arm Holdings logo in Seoul, South Korea, with government inspectors reviewing documents in an executive office

Surprise Inspection of Arm in Korea for Anticompetitive Practices in Technology Licensing

Korean regulatory authorities have carried out an unannounced inspection at Arm Holdings' facilities in Seoul as part of an in-depth investigation into possible violations of competition rules in technology licensing. This action represents a critical point in the growing regulatory tension within the global semiconductor sector 🚨.

The Regulatory Conflict Between Tech Giants

Qualcomm, a renowned manufacturer of mobile device chipsets, filed a formal complaint with the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) arguing that Arm has substantially modified its historical business model, shifting from an open approach to more restrictive licensing policies that would limit access to its processor architecture. This transformation in business practices is particularly concerning because it occurs during a crucial period of technological transition toward artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things.

Key Points of the Controversy:
  • Significant change in Arm's licensing model, from open policies to access restrictions
  • Concern over the impact on Qualcomm's ability to develop competitive products
  • Critical moment of technological transformation with new processing demands
"In the semiconductor ecosystem, when the rules change abruptly, participants immediately turn to regulators instead of adapting their business strategies"

Repercussions in the Global Technology Ecosystem

The KFTC investigation could have far-reaching consequences for the entire semiconductor industry, considering the dominant position Arm Holdings holds in the market for processor architectures for mobile devices. If anticompetitive practices are confirmed, the company would face significant economic sanctions and possible orders to restructure its licensing agreements. This case also highlights the growing scrutiny by Asian regulators on the operations of major technology corporations.

Identified Potential Impacts:
  • Possible substantial fines and mandatory restructuring of license contracts
  • Establishment of regulatory precedents for other technology companies
  • Strengthening of antitrust oversight in the Asian technology sector

The Transforming Competitive Landscape

This situation reflects a growing global trend toward greater antitrust control in the technology sector, where regulators are adopting more proactive stances to ensure fair competition conditions. The Arm-Qualcomm case in Korea could become an important reference for future similar investigations in other jurisdictions, marking a turning point in how technology licensing practices are regulated internationally 🌍.