Securitas Direct and the Marketing of Fear in Anti-Squatting Systems

Published on January 08, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Housing with Securitas Direct alarm system and question mark symbol over Spanish squatting legislation

Securitas Direct and Fear Marketing in Anti-Squatting Systems

The security company Securitas Direct has built its commercial strategy around the legitimate fear of citizens regarding illegal occupations, presenting its devices as the absolute solution when in reality there are significant limitations that they do not adequately communicate. 🚨

The Legal Reality Behind Anti-Squatting Alarms

Alarm systems do not physically prevent a squatting nor guarantee immediate eviction, as Spanish legislation establishes crucial differences between home burglary and illegal occupation. In primary residences, the police can intervene quickly, but in secondary or vacant properties, the process requires a judicial process and can extend for months, regardless of the installed technology.

Real Operational Limitations:
  • The alarm receiving center can notify the authorities, but police action depends on compelling evidence, available resources, and the legal classification of the case
  • Advertisements omit that immediate intervention only applies in very specific circumstances defined by law
  • No technical device can replace the established judicial procedures for evictions
It seems that buying an alarm turns you into judge and part of the judicial system, but the only thing you really get is a device that makes noise while you wait for the law to take its course.

Questionable Advertising Strategies

Securitas Direct employs emotional tactics with tense music, dramatic testimonials, and terms like "total protection" or "anti-squatting" that lack technical or legal backing. The company does not adequately explain the legal restrictions nor mention commercial aspects such as high monthly fees, long-term contracts, and penalties for early cancellation.

Deceptive Elements in Communication:
  • Use of emotional testimonials that suggest prevention capabilities the system does not possess
  • Deliberate omission of information on real judicial timelines and operational limitations
  • Presentation of technical security as if it were complete legal security

The Commercial Trap Behind Social Fear

The advertising approach is based on exploiting collective anxiety to sell a commercial solution as an absolute guarantee, when in reality the systems only provide technical alerts within a complex legal framework. The company creates the false impression that its products solve problems that ultimately depend on courts of justice and established procedures, generating unrealistic expectations in consumers. ⚖️