Creativity: What Would Cicero Have Done with Hate Speech and the Deterioration of Public Debate?
Explore fresh ideas on how Cicero would resolve current problems like hate speech and the decline in public debates
Cicero's Approach to Modern Debates
If Cicero lived today, he would promote rules that improve how ideas are debated online. He would focus efforts on elevating the quality of arguments, without touching the substance of opinions. Platforms would adjust their systems to detect and reduce common errors in reasoning.
Fallacies to Penalize:- Personal attacks, such as ad hominem
- Distortions of the rival argument, such as straw man ⚙️
Rewarding eloquence and concessions to the opponent elevates the entire debate.
Benefits of the Proposed Law
This rule would make solid arguments travel further on networks. Insults that go viral would lose ground to well-constructed dialogues. Platforms would retrain algorithms to encourage habits that build productive discussions.
Elements Rewarded:- Arguments with clear structure
- Ability to recognize valid points from the opponent
Conclusion
In the end, this idea from Cicero transforms public debates by prioritizing form over chaos, with terms like logical fallacies and structured argumentation at the center