Business Statement Reveals Pandemic Meeting with Political Implications

Published on January 05, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Photograph of dark judicial corridors with a blurry figure in the background representing business statements

Business Statement Reveals Pandemic Meeting with Political Implications

The statements of Víctor de Aldama have generated a political earthquake in power circles, revealing details about a meeting held during the most critical period of the pandemic with the then Canary Islands president Ángel Víctor Torres. The meeting, focused on the acquisition of sanitary material, now shows new investigative angles that could have unpredictable consequences 🕵️‍♂️

The Judicial Shadow Extends Over Institutions

The businessman's words have created a domino effect in the National Court, where each new revelation seems to connect official meetings with possible irregularities in contracting. Judge Ismael Moreno's investigation advances meticulously, following the threads that could link political decisions with questionable businesses during the health emergency.

Key Elements of the Investigation:
  • Meeting between businessman and Canary Islands president during pandemic restrictions
  • Negotiations on the acquisition of masks and diagnostic tests
  • Possible connections between political decisions and business benefits
Statements before the court are not mere formalities, but windows into realities that would prefer to remain hidden in the corridors of power

The Development of the Judicial Investigation

The Judge Ismael Moreno has become the central axis of this investigation, unraveling layers of information that connect high-level meetings with commercial operations during the health crisis. His work is bringing to light how the protection material contracts were managed in moments of maximum citizen need.

Aspects Currently Under Investigation:
  • Contracting procedures during the state of alarm
  • Relationships between public officials and supplier companies
  • Possible misappropriations in the management of emergency funds

Political and Social Consequences

This case represents a turning point in the public perception of pandemic management, where transparency in contracting becomes the center of the debate. While the population trusted institutions for their protection, these revelations raise serious doubts about the real mechanisms that operated behind official decisions 🤔