Sapphire Executive Calls for More Freedom to Manufacture Graphics Cards

Published on January 05, 2026 | Translated from Spanish
Ed Crisler, Sapphire Technology's public relations executive, smiling while holding a custom Radeon graphics card at a technology fair.

A Sapphire Executive Calls for More Freedom to Manufacture Graphics Cards

In the graphics hardware sector, the relationship between those who design the GPU cores and those who assemble the final cards is always a topic of debate. 🖥️ Ed Crisler, head of public relations for Sapphire Technology in North America, has expressed a clear stance on this during an interview.

A Call to Relax Design Restrictions

Crisler argues that companies like AMD or Nvidia should allow their manufacturing partners a greater margin for creativity. His vision is that these partners can develop more tailored and unique solutions, rather than following excessively rigid guidelines dictated by the chip supplier. This request touches the core of an ongoing discussion: how much control the silicon manufacturer should maintain over the product that the customer ultimately uses.

Areas where manufacturers seek to innovate:
  • Power delivery system (VRM): To improve energy efficiency and stability in overclocking.
  • Thermal dissipation: Develop more effective or quieter heatsinks and fans.
  • Clock frequencies: Adjust performance profiles more aggressively and segmentally.
If they had more freedom, they could optimize aspects like power delivery or cooling in bolder ways. This would allow for a more diverse range of products.

The Other Side of the Coin: Consistency and Brand Control

On the other hand, GPU giants establish these guidelines for fundamental reasons. They seek to ensure a uniform user experience and maintain the stability of their architectures. Strict control helps protect the brand's reputation and prevents low-quality designs from harming the public perception of the chip's performance. The real challenge lies in finding a middle ground.

Reasons for control by Nvidia and AMD:
  • Ensure reliability: Avoid failures due to inadequate PCB designs or cooling.
  • Protect brand integrity: A bad product from a partner can damage the image of the entire architecture.
  • Simplify support: Fewer design variations make technical support and driver development easier.

In Search of the Ideal Balance

Crisler's request is not isolated; it reflects a constant desire in the industry for more tools to compete and stand out. While some advocate for necessary standardization, card manufacturers like ASUS, Gigabyte, or Sapphire itself yearn for spaces to experiment without compromising basic reliability. In the end, as the article's analogy points out, it's similar to asking for permission to thoroughly modify a borrowed engine, something rarely granted without conditions. The future might see an evolution toward a model with more collaboration and better-defined margins of action. ⚖️